Will University of Texas AD’s Arrogance End 100+ Year Rivalry? Will Texas A&M Fire Football Coach Sherman?

Texas A&M University was founded in 1876 as the first public institution of higher education in Texas. It was called Texas AMC. The University of Texas followed and was founded in 1883. For nearly a century, Texas A&M University was a military school out in the middle of the Texas countryside. A&M did not allow women and focused on sending thousands of military officers into battle, including several who received the Congressional Medal of Honor (this is where Aggies get the strong military traditions). The University of Texas, on the other hand, was placed in the Capitol of Texas, Austin, TX. The University of Texas was not a military school. It was in a big city, it was more modern, and so it became more popular.

The Aggies and the Longhorns first began playing each other in 1894. They met for the 118th time on the football field this past Thursday November 24th, 2011.

It might be the last time they meet.

In the early years of the rivalry, the Longhorns certainly had the upper hand against the less modern, military school rival, and the Longhorns won most of these early games. Texas A&M would still win some of the games and they built historic football traditions along the way (like the 12th Man and even a 1939 National Championship). The rivalry got bigger and better with every year that passed. The Aggies would build an annual bonfire to burn the week before the Texas game. The Longhorns would have a Hex rally in the week before the Aggie game. Both schools mention this rivalry in their fight song. This game was the most important game every year for Texas A&M and Texas.

In more modern times, Texas A&M became less of a military school as it transitioned into a regular university. A&M quickly became a big, modern University like the University of Texas. Add scholarship parity into the equation, and both schools became nearly even in everything from enrollment to academics and especially athletic program rankings. Today, both schools have around 50,000 students. Both schools have similar average SAT scores of new students. A&M has a top business school and UT has a top Law School. Both schools have multiple sports in the top 25 and both have sports with recent national championships. In the most recent Director’s Cup National Rankings of Overall Athletic Program Performance, A&M is ranked 8th and the Longhorns are ranked 12th.

In this modern era, from 1975 to 2011, the football rivalry is nearly even. Texas A&M University has won 19 games and UT has won 18 games out of these last 37 games played.

In one stretch in the 1980’s and 1990’s, A&M won 11 of 12 games played between the two teams. This was the time of A&M’s Wrecking Crew and the dominance that A&M had at home (KYLE FIELD). Then Mack Brown became the coach at the University of Texas and things turned around for the Longhorns. The Longhorns started to get back into the national scene again and they even won a National Championship on the back of their star quarterback Vince Young.

This rivalry is heated, competitive and in this modern time, anyone can win the game in any given year. In modern times the rivalry is split nearly evenly down the middle in wins and losses. This year’s game is a perfect example. A&M lost the game in the way they have all season long. A&M had a second half meltdown filled with game costing mistakes. Even so, the game was neck and neck till a last-minute, questionable penalty gave UT a much needed first down that resulted in the game winning field goal for the longhorns.

Could that be a reason why UT’s Athletic Director DeLoss Dodds does not want the rivalry to continue? Dodds and Texas Coach Mack Brown have been in the hot seat with the last couple of seasons being considered as failures for the University of Texas. Big college teams typically want their non conference schedule to be as easy as possible with maybe one competitive game against a good non-conference team. With the Aggies heading to the SEC, the Longhorns would have to give up one of their easy non conference games to keep playing the Aggies. The Aggies are up for the challenge and they want to keep the rivalry alive. Texas Athletic Director on the other hand has made the silly statement that the Longhorn schedule is “booked” until 2018 and they cannot play the Aggies. That of course is just an excuse because non conference games, especially against small schools, can be changed or rescheduled with relative ease.

The Aggies are heading off to the SEC. They have every right to want to go to a conference that is looked upon as the best football conference in the nation. This could lead to many more perks than the Big 12 has to offer and more resources to build their football program back up. Texas A&M University is not going anywhere. It is still in Texas. Residents in Texas will now get to see some of the good SEC teams every year in College Station, TX. The Longhorns, on the other hand, are staying in the big 12 and are building their own television network. They have every right to do that too (within the NCAA guidelines of course). College football does not get money from tuition. It is its own business and has to keep building and creating sources of revenue. So the Aggies are going to a different conference and the Longhorns have their own network.

Regardless of the Longhorn Network and Regardless of the Aggies going to the SEC, the Rivalry can and should go on. There are several big name Universities that meet every year to play their in-state rivalry even though the two teams are in different conferences.

Make no question about it. The ball is in the Longhorn’s court right now. We can argue about how it all started and who did the most to hurt the rivalry, but right now, at the end of the day, most of the fans would still like to see the rivalry go on, there is big money in the game for the State of Texas, and the Aggie Athletic Director Bill Byrne says it can still be done.

The only thing holding up the rivalry is the Longhorn Athletic Director DeLoss Dodds who says he will not do it. That is a shame and a horrible reason for this storied rivalry to end.

Will Texas A&M University Fire Coach Sherman?

The glory years of the 80’s and 90’s are gone, and for the last decade A&M football has been on a downslide away from their dominance of the 80’s and 90’s. A&M hired Coach Fran (Dennis Franchione) hoping that he would turn things around, but he only drove the program into the ground, barely getting above .500 over 5 seasons. Fran did beat the Longhorns in his last two seasons as head coach, but that was not good enough and he was shown the door. Coach Sherman, the great coach from the Green Bay packers, was ushered in to save the day.

It is four years since Mike Sherman took over and he has been mediocre at best. He is in the hot seat and the question is not whether to fire him. The question is what is going to keep A&M from being able to fire their underperforming coach.

Mike Sherman is now 25-25 in 4 seasons as the Head Football Coach at Texas A&M. This 2011 season will go down as one of the most disappointing seasons in Aggie History. The first two seasons in the Sherman era were not good, but he was a new coach so they gave him some time to get better. His third year, last year, was not good at first because of an injured quarterback that Sherman kept in the game. Sherman finally changed quarterbacks and A&M finished off the season in spectacular fashion. This year, Texas A&M was ranked in the top ten to begin the season. They had some of the best talent in college football and returned most of the players who were part of the Big 12 South Champion (tie) team that won 6 in a row last season against top teams like Oklahoma and Nebraska. Sherman, at most, could only lose a couple of games this season with the talent he had to work with. WRONG. Texas A&M lost 6 games including a loss to Texas (who also is an no performing up to standards this year). A&M would build up a large lead in the first half of these losses, but then they would lose the second half miserably. That would indicate bad second half adjustments. The quarterback did make un-timely interceptions in many of those losses, but still, the responsibility of winning games falls on the shoulders of the head coach who gets paid millions to win or to make whatever changes are necessary to win.

It is unreasonable to think that a college team will never lose any games. On the other hand, having a record of 25-25 after 4 seasons is completely unacceptable, especially given the talent that A&M has been able to round up.

There is controversy over whether Coach Sherman’s payout is around 2 million or closer to 9 million.

Depending on the payout and depending on the bowl game score, Sherman might not make it another season. Many people even believe he should be fired immediately no matter what the cost. If A&M made the mistake of giving Sherman such a large buyout (9 million), and/or if Sherman wins this bowl game, then he will likely be back for another year.

It is also possible that A&M wants to give him another year to see how he does in the SEC.

Regardless of how things end up, this season will go down as one of the biggest failures given the amazing talent to work with. If Sherman gets another year, I really hope he will be successful. I do not wish for him to be bad because if Sherman is bad then that means A&M is losing.

As for now, Sherman has been a failure, and he is in the hot seat.

 

Comments

UT's network gave everyone problems. UT even wanted to break NCAA regulations and show high school football games. UT wanted A&M to pay half of the cost of the Network even though A&M would not get half back out of the network. UT was the team to try to leave the conference before A&M ever tried to. UT is the bad guy. A&M is doing good to go to greener pastures. The UT vs A&M game can and should go on. After all the pointing fingers, the decision not to play the game rests with the UT athletic Director. What is UT afraid of if all the Longhorn fans think A&M is such an easy team to beat?

as a Texas student and business major it is hard to say much more than what I am about to say wow, 1 sided argument there, forget the fact that Texas is the number 1 ranked school in the state for business... A&M isn't even second being behind TCU and SMU for business. They chose to leave. Their loss. The last game ended in typical fashion UT on top.

yes, I would expect the 2 schools to play again in the future. UT might be mad for a couple of years but they will get over it and the game will be played again

sucked for several decades? I guess you forgot about the 80's and 90's when A&M dominated football including a decade where UT cuold not even beat A&M! UT has had good times recently with their championship but before Mack Brown they were nothing in the last few decades. They are going back down too with the last two bad seasons

Missouri flirted with the Big 10 but the loss would not have made much of an impact in the Big 12 and even less in Texas. Texas flirted with the Pac 10 which would have impacted the Big 12 almost into elimination. Throughout this past year there were issues within the Big 12 related to the use of the Longhorn Network that broke with initial agreements within the conference. While always remaining an option, A&M recognized how quickly the Big 12 could implode given that Big 12 leadership was non-existent. Rather than wait and go to the Pac 12 as a package with Texas and others, A&M chose to make the move first to the SEC as a better conference fit than the Pac 12 and a stronger option over the Big 12 to even survive. Increasing earning opportunities also exist with the SEC. While pointing at A&M as the one that abandoned the Big 12, consider that Texas first spoke with the Pac 10 prior to A&M going to the SEC and then again with the Pac 12 after A&M made the move.
Moving beyond the emotions surrounding who is arrogant or who left who or breaking tradition or whatever, the bottom-line is that it makes sense for A&M & Texas to play the annual rivalry game. It truly is a tradition that matters to generations of college football fans throughout Texas as well as alumni across the country. Being in the same conference is irrelevant - most of the OU/Texas rivalry has been played while in different conferences. It should actually add to the relevance as another differentiation to recruiting to have the Big 12 play against the SEC in such a rivalry game - THAT would be fun.

If no one cares that which school was started first, why do you bring this up as your first 'point'?
It is laughable that you want to play the it-is-just-mere-details card with your 'it technically doesn't matter which came first', but turn right around and say that details do matter when you bring up the A&M 11-of-12 dominance over the horns.  Which is it?
Your final 'point' is as one-sided as this article.  If you think A&M is running from the Big 12(-2)(-1)(+2)(-1) because it can't win there, you're are only kidding yourself.  I would buy this argument if A&M was running to conference USA, sunbelt, or similar conference, but they are jumping into the SEC.  The SEC West, to be exact.  That would be the very definition of jumping from the frying pan into the fire.
All I know is that both schools have made decisions that are perceived by the other as direct threats, whether it be Texas starting their own network, or A&M abandoning the Big 12.  That said, only one of the schools has made it abundantly clear it will play the other any time, any place.

Your about as blind as most other TU student, exes or just the "t-shirt" longhorns. Aggies by leaving are basically showing you they can do without TU....And they can. The Longhorn Network?? Broke ever rule the Big 12 ever had about revenue sharing.

As for Kyle Field sellouts. Every game has been a sellout for years and  plans are being worked on even now to expand to 100k or even 110k to accomodate the crowds. We'll need them when real teams like LSU, Alabama and others come to town.

So when the Big 12-11-10 crashes remember the War Hymn "Goodbye to Texas University...so long to the orange and the white. lolol....just what the world needs....a great law school and more lawyers.

Texas : 47 national championships, 39 are NCAA national championships.

Texas A&M : 13 national championships, 10 are NCAA national championships.

I know that people love to pick arbitrary dates and look at records.  Lets look at A&M from 1945-1974 (the glory years)

119-174-15

Have fun in the SEC.

You sir are an idiot. A&M is and always has overestimated their football programs performance ability. Every year the antiquated aggies carry on about how "good" their team is and how badly they are going to beat whichever team on the schedule that year... however, their stat records reveal otherwise. Then, adding insult to injury, aggies will always justify losing by making up some incredulous excuse that puts the refs, opposing teams' players and/or staff to blame. If UT loses, the majority of the longhorns don't blame other factors as the cause of their loss and will accept responsibility by stating the reality of the situation (i.e.; "we played like cr*p"). 
So the Aggies going to the SEC is just another decision made based on their delusional perception of their football programs' potential. A&M will soon realize how wrong they were and will soon resort to being a basketball school in the SEC due to their inability to compete with the other SEC football programs. 
Goodbye & Good Luck Ags! HA! 

The Aggies moving to the SEC ended the chance of the rivalry continuing on a yearly basis.
Also, why does the "modern era" start in 1975, instead of 1960?

Pages

TexasGOPVote
 

© 2015 TexasGOPVote  | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy