Michael Medved, Sarah Palin Was Not ASKED To Explain The Purpose Of Paul Revere's Ride!

Michael Medved fell into the popular inclination to analyze every word Sarah Palin says, as a submitted essay response to a question of their own imagination. He assessed Palin’s answer to a questioner about what she took from her visit to Boston’s “Freedom Trail” as a submission for an encyclopedia on the history, purpose, and accomplishment of Revere’s ride. Most people know the story that Revere took the message from lanterns in the North Church tower, “One if by land, two if by sea.” But Palin was particularly inspired by Revere’s warning to the British who in fact had captured him, that the people were warned and would actively resist attempts at disarming and controlling them. Not at all harshly, but a tad didactically, Medved advised that hers was not a competent description of Paul Revere’s ride. Her words were never intended to be more than a response to the question of what she took from her tour. This is the email I sent to Medved:

“She was asked what SHE took from her experience. And the disarmament and control of the public is a particular concern to a liberty-minded Western frontier American. I would assume that most people assume the standard explanation of Paul Revere’s ride. The challenge to the British that their efforts to control would be knowledgeably resisted was important to HER. This analysis, of whether her report was a complete analysis of history, is to submit to the rabid hyper-critical disposition toward everything she says and does. What would she do as president? (Medved’s question to a caller) This kind of question from people like yourself is fascinating to me. And I’m a regular listener in great general agreement with you. I’m thinking: seriously, ARE YOU KIDDING ME?! Sometimes people who adopt this disposition seem never to have explored her record. She will be THE MOST EFFECTIVE AND MOST COMPLETE at unwinding the terrific harm that has been done over time, and most sweepingly in the past few years. And why? Because she is a policy wonk and an academic as Obama and others are said to be? No. Ironically enough, it’s because she is not in a contrived way, but quite naturally endowed with more testicular fortitude than any candidate or potential candidate at least since Reagan. And boy, do we need it.”


Make sure to check out the comments on Facebook.

The liberal media shows it's typical liberal bias by smearing Governer Palin as usual.  That is why far more people watch the news on Fox. No one can say for sure that Paul Revere didnt ring a bell, and he DID warn the British because they would of heard him just like the Americans did.  They is so scaired of Palin because they know she would easily defeat the porch monkey in the White House.

Sarah Palin is the most down to earth, wholesome, and courageous all-American that we've seen in politics since Ronald Reagan. The people that hate (read: fear) her the most are those who detest the idea of a return to the moral values that made our country the leader, and the envy, of the world. Those who have been swimming in the salacious sewers of corruption are in morbid fear of having their lascivious ways exposed as antithetical to the future of a great country. Additionally, many detest the idea of a woman the having the authority to lead. If ever there was a woman who proved she could lead it is Sarah Palin. Just research her record from city council to governor and how masterfully she fought the corruption, even in her own party and you'll get a good idea of why the Washington establishment wants nothing to do with her. They don't want someone inside the beltway that is willing to tell the truth, even if it means exposing corruption in her party.   

Todd, take a good look at this excerpt from your response: "They is so scaired of Palin..."  You may want to refer back to your elementary school text books, where you'll find that the subject and verb in a sentence must agree.  It should read... they are, not they is.  A good old fashioned dictionary will show that the correct spelling of the term is s-c-a-r-e-d.  Learn how to spell and use correct grammar before you attempt to hurl ignorant racial slurs.  Better yet, people with such a lack of intelligence should not attempt to offer political opinions.  Sheer ignorance, much to the like of that which is in question,  is what got this country to its current economic state.  Looking at your response, we could definitely do without your opinion.  Governor Palin needs all of the help that she can get, but not from ignorant racist bigots.  The definitions of "ignorant" and "bigot" can be found in any online dictionary such as www.dictionary.com.

Pretty component of content. I just stumbled upon your web site and in accession capital to claim that I get actually loved account your blog posts. Anyway I will be subscribing on your feeds and even I success you get right of entry to persistently rapidly. Digital Products Information - Kindle Fire Review - Sy Yuliani

© 2015 TexasGOPVote  | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy