Congressman Blake Farenthold on U.S. Military Intervention in Syria

After attending Friday’s classified briefing and listening to the people I represent, I have decided to vote against U.S. military intervention in Syria’s civil war. Our involvement could further destabilize an unstable region, and there is no clear mission or desired outcome that has been articulated to Congress or the American people. If we were to get involved, it should be as part of a large coalition of our allies and with the support of the U.N. We should not be doing this alone, and I have concerns that proceeding with military action in Syria could lead to another war on par with Iraq or Afghanistan.

Issues: 

Comments

Thank You for truly representing your constituents as well as the American people as a whole on this issue, Mr. Blake Farenthold. I write as a proud American who would rather help my family, my friends, my neighbors and I than help the Al-Qaida or Brotherhood. This sentiment is overwhelming throughout my community and all over the world. We do not have a vital interest in Syria. We do not face an imminent threat from Syria. Your decision to vote for No reckless military intervention into Syria is well respected and supported by the US Constitution you swore to uphold.

Currently, there are no Americans at risk in the Syrian Civil War and no American lives have been lost. Lets keep it that way. Even a "limited" war would be a bad thing to support here. There is no such thing as a limited war and you cannot limit the retaliation of the people you bomb on purpose or by accident. Not just the pilots, but the people that work in embassies, on ships or at ports, diplomats, etc. and all servicemen and women would be at much greater risk for attack and retaliation if we mindlessly butt in to their Civil War. Not one more dollar should be spent in Syria either. The billions that the UK has estimated this war would cost the US is not worth borrowing for.
TexasGOPVote
 

© 2015 TexasGOPVote  | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy