Religious Censorship at Houston National Cemetery

Recently I sent the following letter to Department of Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki insisting that he fire Houston National Cemetery Director Arleen Ocasio immediately, and that he reopen the cemetery’s chapel and issue a clear statement that veterans support organizations and their prayers are welcome at all VA facilities.

Secretary Shinseki,

I am writing to let you know that I am in complete agreement with the May 26, 2011 ruling from United States District Judge Lynn N. Hughes (below). Ms. Arleen Ocasio’s actions violate the Constitution, and I insist that you remove her as Director of the Houston National Cemetery immediately. In addition, I ask that you reopen the cemetery’s chapel for its intended purpose and reequip it as a functioning, non-denominational place of worship. I also ask that you make it clear to veterans organizations, such as the Veterans of Foreign Wars and the National Memorial Ladies, that they are always welcome at VA facilities and that they can pray in any manner they choose if requested by a veteran’s surviving spouse or family member.

Judge Hughes’ order eloquently expresses the outrage I felt as I learned about these events, and it is urgent that you remedy this problem immediately. Limiting the free speech of any American is outrageous and unconstitutional, but it is especially offensive to restrict the First Amendment rights of veterans when they have fought and sacrificed to defend those rights.

VA Deputy General Counsel, John H. (Jack) Thompson, in a letter to the Liberty Institute, wrote that directors of national cemeteries can apply whatever limitations they deem reasonable. I vehemently disagree. As a defender of this great nation, you are well aware that no individual or government agency has the authority to restrict the Constitutional rights of American citizens.

I am so appalled with these developments that I intend to amend the MilCon/VA Appropriations Bill to reinforce Judge Hughes’ order and ensure that the First Amendment rights of veterans and their families are protected at each and every VA facility.

Thank you for complying with my requests in a timely manner.

Sincerely,
John Culberson
Member of Congress


Temporary Restraining Order issued by Judge Hughes for Scott Rainey vs. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and Arleen Ocasio

Memorial Day began as a regular observance to honor the 300,000 who died fighting for the Union. It has expanded to honor all of those who have given the United States “the last full measure of devotion.” This year, as in past years, a charity has proposed to conduct a ceremony on Memorial Day. It is the National Cemetery Council of Greater Houston.

The director of Houston’s National Cemetery, Arleen Ocasio, required the ministers who are scheduled to deliver the invocation and benediction to submit their prayers to her for approval. The minister who has prayed as part of the program in other years is Scott Rainey. This year he is to give the invocation. Rainey promptly sent his draft prayer to Ocasio. She responded that the tone “must be inclusive of all beliefs . . . non-denominational.” Rainey called her, and she told him that if he did not remove the reference to one religion, he would not be allowed to pray.

Rainey appealed her decree to the general counsel of the Department of Veterans Affairs. John H. (Jack) Thompson, a deputy of his, gave the celebrants until three o’clock this afternoon to consent to the deletions of references to specific religions – an act he said would make it non-denominational when he meant non-religious. He asserted the government’s “discretion” to keep prayers “fitting.”

Along with funerals and private visits, veterans’ cemeteries are the sites for observances on broader occasions like V-J Day, Independence Day, and Veterans Day. These events come in two categories: government paid and privately paid. When the tax payers directly fund a program, it may generally decide who may participate and what they may say, just as it may require its employees to talk about work, not sports. The government may require people invited to talk about highway funding not to talk about international trade. Beyond that narrow, practical proprietary interest, the government may not dictate what people say. The government cannot gag citizens when it says it is in the interest of national security, and it cannot do it in some bureaucrat’s notion of cultural homogeneity. The right to free expression ranges from the dignity of Abraham Lincoln’s speeches to Charlie Sheen’s rants.

Thompson told the pastor that “the ceremony will commemorate veterans of all cultures and beliefs, and the tone of remarks must therefore be inclusive.” The government’s compulsion of a program’s inclusion or exclusion of a particular religion offends the Constitution. The Constitution does not confide to the government the authority to compel emptiness in a prayer, where a prayer belongs. The gray mandarins of the national government are decreeing how citizens honor their veterans. This is not a pick-up-your-trash sign; this is a we-pick-your-words sign.

These people say that remarks need to be content-neutral messages. The men buried in the cemetery fought for their fellow Americans – for us. In those fights, they were served by chaplains, chaplains of two faiths and many denominations, chaplains in the field.

They ministered to men who needed them – to all – not only to their personal calling. No deputy general counsel of the Department of Veterans Affairs was in the Ia Drang Valley. The veteran may be Jewish and his friends may be Christians – or Christians, atheists, Moslems, pagans, Shinto, and Sikh. “Friends,” of course, means all who appreciate what they did. The government cannot realistically speak for the religious sensibilities of the numerous and varied people of America, even if it were constitutional for it to try. It is for them to speak for themselves as when the President asked Rick Warren to speak for him in Jesus’ name at his inauguration. Americans are free – free to read, write, talk, and pray without permission from George III or other governmental power.

1. Reasons. These are the reasons to enjoin the government:

A. Rainey is likely to prevail on his claims that the government is unconstitutionally censoring his speech. The government only objects that his message contains religious references. Rainey weaves religion among the day’s subjects. The law protects Rainey’s speech;

B. Not allowing Rainey to invoke Jesus’ name or refer to his religious beliefs will irreparably harm him. Limiting a person’s freedoms of speech and religion is an irreparable injury. Money cannot replace the freedom he would lose;

C. The unrepresented public will not be harmed if the government is enjoined, but Rainey will be harmed if he is forced to omit his religious beliefs from the invocation; and D. The law protects all people’s Constitutional rights, including Rainey’s Constitutional rights.

2. Temporary Restraint. Arleen Ocasio, the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, and all those in concert with them are forbidden from dictating the content of speeches – whether those speeches are denominated prayers or otherwise – at the Memorial Day ceremony of National Cemetery Council for Greater Houston. The government is cautioned that interferences for this suit’s having been brought would be a further Constitutional violation.

Signed on May 26, 2011, at Houston, Texas.

Lynn N. Hughes
United States District Judge

Comments

Make sure to check out the comments on Facebook.

As a citizen of the United States and a person who has lived in Houston most of my life, I am saddened to hear that Ms. Ocasio wants to censor prayers at the Houston National cemetary.  This is unconstitutional!  I call for dismissal of Ms. Ocasio.  Why does she think she has the right to decide what words we can use in our prayers. 

Flo Tuten




I find it offensive that I took an oath to protect God and my country when I joined the military during Vietnam, and the VA that fights me at every turn for medical care finds it appropriate to say I cannot utter God's name during a funeral service as a veteran.  I put myself in harms way to serve God and this country and I'll be damned if anyone is going to tell me I cannot utter his name.  www.cemops.com

What a slap in the face to all our military who have risked their lives so Ms Ocasio can enjoy her freedom.  Her picture standing next to an American flag makes me just shake my head.  What is she thinking?  I would like to offer to take all Ms. Ocasio's money because I am sure she won't want anything that says "In God we Trust" on it.  If she gets her way with this goofy decision to keep God out of the veteran's funerals it won't do her any good.  God will be there regardless if he is mentioned out loud or not.  He'll be there.

It why past time the woman or heathen needs to be ran off the holy grounds of our Vets burial place. She needs to be gone where do we sign petition to have her removed. if there isnt a petition someone in houston needs to get one posted online right away with all the charges of this heathen woman. i am so proud of this Congressman I just want to cry. Now this is the actions of a great congressman you folks are so blessed to havve  good man like this represnting you all. Sadly we have a horrid congressman in Matin Henrich. OMG I on't ait until we can vote him out of office. He is so liberal and I tell you he would most likely support this heathen woman, God Bless you all there in Houstan and remeber do not vote Democrat and no why vote for obama in 2012 we got to have a leder like you hav in this brave congressman John Colberson. Amen.

I am a Vietnam era veteran, the son of a WWII veteran, and I find the judge's ruling and the comments here ridiculous. There was never an attempt to prohibit mention of the word "God" during a funeral service. None at all. The controversy arose because the cemetery director chose to require that the religious beliefs of one minister not be injected into a Memorial Day ceremony (not a funeral) intended to honor and respect veterans of all beliefs -- including Muslims, Jews, Buddhists, and atheists. Any minister with the most basic understanding of the concept of religious freedom should know that not every veteran's family wants to hear about Jesus -- but this in no way prohibits any veteran's family from praying to whatever god they believe in (or to prohibit all references to any divinity at all) at the funeral of a family member.

I am just outraged, as I have been reading about this particular incident. 
She is the director of a cemetery, not the ruler of what people say when they are in that cemetery.

The fact that she told them to submit their speeches to her for the memorial day prayer just shows how grandiose she thinks she is; and I believe she greatly overstepped her authority in every conceivable manner, broken the law, and is violating the civil rights of many people.  How is it a PRAYER if you can't pray while you say it !?

I am very tired of the fake 'separation of church and state' issue.  There is no amendment that says there is a separation.  There is an amendment saying the state shall make NO LAWS about religion, enforcing or denying them.  Today's liberal fascists have it all backwards.  They not only wanted 'church in state' our founding fathers prayed with the bible before and during sessions of congress, set funds aside to make sure all public schools bibles, and one speech by a founding father, included the reference 'we are all of one religion, with some differences' in making a point about the creation of a country and the things that would hold it together (being of similar Christian beliefs).

While the government whines about 'not including everyone' they also forget that probably 99% of all those in the cemeteries from previous wars, were most likely Christians, that Christians founded this country, and that we are the majority.  Whatever happened to OUR rights as the majority.

The fact that she turned the chapel into a storage unit is a slap in the face to all people of all religions who have lost loved ones to war. 

THEN when I read that she told people they could not say GOD OR JESUS DURING FUNERALS???  Really, who the hell does she think she is.

If my son was being buried, after being KILLED in service to THIS country, and some stupid bitch told me that my pastor could not mention the lord Jesus Christ or God during the service, I would punch her straight in the face.  

And I buried my son, when he was 15.  He was devoutly Christian; and since I went incredibly nuts when he died suddenly and unexpectedly, I would be willing to grant that in a war death situation I would have flat jumped right on that woman and it might have taken several people to pull me off.  No way would I obey her directive.

I just read that she is STILL in that job, and she needs to go.  Only sensitive people who care more about the feelings of the families who have lost their sons, husbands and fathers, should be allowed to hold that position. 

Please excuse my language.  But I am very upset.

This post just censored and defamed 2 public servants with religious intolerance and bias. 

Arleen Ocasio sees a sight picture that I do not disagree with.  I'm a 30 year veteran and have seen firsthand particular religious groups using military and veteran related events to insert/advocate their particular beliefs or religious sect.  I’m very tolerant but have been embarrassed, ashamed and disappointed when the speakers cannot keep their remarks respectful of other denominations and beliefs.  Shame on them not on her.

 

© 2015 TexasGOPVote  | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy