Texas GOP Vote

...to make your point.
Bestiality (however unpalatable)  is utterly Irrelevant.
They're are going to make it legal to detain american citizens without due process of law, violating their 5th amendment rights.

That the author would waste our time in attempt to get us to concern ourselves with irrelevancy would indicate to me that he is okay with removal of my constitutional rights.
Which incidentally protects my choice of life partner, be it the woman I love or the man I may were I wired that way.

there is a big difference between just working with someone and being forced to shower with someone. I do not have a problem working with a gay person. I have a problem being forced to shower with a gay person. I might trust them with my life but I do not want to shower with them. Would you make a woman shower with a man? NO! Why foece a straight guy to shower with a gay guy? Gays in the unique setting of the military causes issues. Those kinds of issues are fine in a workplace but they are not fine in battle where you sleep and shower together. They are distractions. I trust a gay person to fight with me but I do not trust him to not be checking me out in the shower. Same thing with women. A woman is perfectly capable to serve on a submarine, but the problems it would cause having one woman and 50 men under water for 6 months would cause too much trouble. The military should not be about political correctness. The military should be about having a strong fighting force with minimal distractions

A Fellow TGV blogger already wrote about the President being given the authority to detain Americans on American soil with no trial. That is a very serious flaw in this law. I put a link to that article at the very beginning of my article. There was no need to write a brand new article about that issue when a fellow TGV blogger already wrote an article about that extremely serious issue.

a job is very different from the military and battle. In the military there has to be complete uniformity and as little distractions as possible. This causes distractions. Why have uniformity at all if this curve ball is trown into things? Also, in the military you have to sleep and shower together. There is no problem working with a gay person at a regular job because you are not forced to shower with that person. Military members are being forced to shower with gay guys. How is that different from making a man and a woman shower together?

I like you.

A Fellow TGV blogger already wrote about that other aspect of the law dealing with the President being given the authority to detain Americans on American soil with no trial. I put a link to that article at the very beginning of my article. There was no need to write a brand new article about that issue when a fellow TGV blogger already wrote an article about that extremely serious issue.

A big amen to you! I want to marry my cat and my horse and the tree in my front yard, then I will demand that I be allowed to take out life & health insurance policies on them, and then I want them to be eligible for Social Security benefits as my dependents

you know.. the topic of bestiality doesn't really freak me out so much.. or at least, let me say that the act of it suddenly not being against military law doesn't strike me as all that major of a thing
Maybe that's because I would never consider having sex with an animal!
You, however, seem to have given it a lot of thought.. and it appears to be at the forefront of your mind.. what does that say about you?  Why is it that when you think "kinky weird freaky sex" your brain comes back with "dude and a sheep"?
I would happily raise my family around my many gay friends before ever intentionally exposing them to people like you with your twisted concepts of others.. I wouldn't want my daughter to learn such hate

its not about the beastiality......
if you allow gays in the military but forbid them to stick it in each others butts..... 
its a bit disingenuous, lol.

Bestiality is forward progress? Go hump a cow faggot.

that is something being forced in American Soldiers. Would men in the real world be forced to shower with gay men? Would women beforced to shower with men? Of course not. Soldiers are pawns of political experiments and there is nothing they can do about it

The removal of the ban on bestiality here affects less than 1% of the population. 3 million active and reserve US troops out of 380 million people gives a number like .07% of US citizens who are covered by UCMJ. There aren't laws that concern it at a Federal level, so I'm not really sure why you aren't simply outraged at the lack of bestiality laws on Florida's books, since that means 18 million people can 'legally' do it there regardless of the NDAA passing or not. 
Wait, nevermind, I am pretty sure why you're not. Probably because like you, I couldn't help but notice that this section you're making a stink about also happens to be the one banning sodomy, which FYI is the way gay and bi men and lots of adventurous straight men and women like to get down sometimes. What with the repeal of DADT, the military probably feels it shouldn't be quite so strict on back-door entry. 
But don't buy into their big gay agenda. Between DADT's repeal, and when I got back from my last tour, war zones and military bases were basically just turning into huge gay orgies. Not disciplined, effective, stressful environments like you might imagine. All that soldier stuff just fell by the wayside because everybody was way too busy just getting gay with each other. Way hard. Now that this, the last small barrier to unlimited, wanton bestiality on the part of the military is going away, I can only imagine how bad things will get. I mean, obviously these people serving who are actually affected by the UCMJ aren't f*cking heroes that fight for your country every day, even fighting for bigots who want you to fight wars for them while they sit in 'christian' judgement of you. Clearly the more reasonable assumption is that we're all just perverted sex maniacs who, barring the UCMJ ban, will just start having sex with every animal in sight. That's basically your point here, right?

So, the GOP is now supporting sex with Animals ?, as if men's airport gay sex wasn't enough ?. I'll never vote GOP again.

you are right, the Senate did not technically vote to legalize beastiality. They voted to repeal the ban and punishment for beastiality. That effectively legalizes it. With the ban against beastiality in the UCMJ, all soldiers were punished for doing it no matter what state they were in. By repealing the ban, soldiers are no longer punished for it by the military. If it is against state law then they could be punished by the state but not all states ban it.

For instance, Florida does not ban beastiality. Therefore, soldiers on a base in florida can have sex with animals on base and not be punished because now it is not against military regulations and it is legal to do it in florida.

I did not stretch the truth. The truth is that the Senate has voted to remove the ban on beastiality. REPUBLICANS voted for this too so I was not just trying to make stuff up about Democrats. I am not happy with my Texas Senators for doing this either.

 

 

Is it not disengenous that you are tying to extend such vote to mean allowing bestiality? Why not come forward and say you oppose overturning DADT and you disagree with Democrats. But to assume overturning such law was intended to allow bestiality is to assume Democrats have intent to sleep with animals, which is just not a honest, civil assumption. You can disagree with your opponent, but dont stretch your argument to the point of making it silly.

You sir are an idiot. They didn't vote to legalize bestiality. Service members are still held to the same standard as you are on this issue. Is it legal for you to perform bestialty? No, the same goes for servicemembers. The UCMJ goes above and beyond state and local laws. It doesn't supersede existing federal and local laws. Dummy.